- 29-08-19Nieuwe pagina: Wet- & Regelgeving specifiek voor de hostingbranche
- 07-08-19RFO netwerkstoring
- 10-07-19BIT genomineerd voor IaaS-/PaaS-leverancier van het Jaar
- 21-05-19Klantcase Aangetekend Mailen
- 09-05-19BIT verhoogt netwerkcapaciteit en -beschikbaarheid met nieuwe switches
- 08-05-19Nationale Datacenter Dag dinsdag 11 juni 2019
- 12-02-19Meerderheid banken heeft online gegevenstransport niet of onvoldoende beveiligd
- 23-01-19Medische wereld heeft onvoldoende aandacht voor privacy
- 29-12-18Hostingsector publiceert gedragscode abusebestrijding
- 28-12-18Update RFO netwerkstoring
New policy for data centers Amsterdam to extreme
Even though it would be beneficial to BIT when there are less data centers being built in Amsterdam, this decision seems ridiculous to me. Why would you ever force one industry to use green energy, but not others? In regard to the re-use of the heat that is produced in data centers, over two years ago the industry indicated that anyone interested in the residual heat could have it for free. So that is not an issue that has to be dealt with by the data centers, but by the buyers. And forcing data centers to use LED lighting? That is like telling someone with an electric car not to turn up the radio because it would use to much power. All businesses (so not just data centers) that use more than 50.000 kWh per year have been obliged for ages to take all energy-saving measures that can be earned back within 5 years. Since July 1st of this year, it is mandatory to proactively inform the government about this. So, using LED lighting instead of fluorescents is practically a given already. Why take such measures then?
An in the meantime they decide – despite all the objections, both from local residents and concerning the environment – to expand Schiphol (municipality of Haarlemmermeer) with 10%.
If you still get it, please let me know…
By: Alex Bik